• Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Your Priority Deal
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Investing
No Result
View All Result
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Investing
No Result
View All Result
Your Priority Deal
No Result
View All Result

Rubio bans overseas outposts commenting on foreign elections unless there’s ‘clear and compelling’ US interest

July 17, 2025
in Politics
Rubio bans overseas outposts commenting on foreign elections unless there’s ‘clear and compelling’ US interest

The State Department will now only weigh in on foreign elections when there is a ‘clear and compelling’ U.S. interest to do so, focusing on strategic significance over spreading democratic values. 

‘Consistent with the administration’s emphasis on national sovereignty, the Department will comment publicly on elections only when there is a clear and compelling U.S. foreign policy interest to do so,’ according to a new memo articulating Secretary Marco Rubio’s directive obtained by Fox News Digital. 

‘Messages should avoid opining on the fairness or integrity of an electoral process, its legitimacy, or the democratic values of the country in question.’

The memo, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, said the U.S. would ‘hold firm to its own democratic values and celebrate those values when other countries choose a similar path,’ but would continue relationships where ‘strategic interests align,’ instead of focusing on values. 

Overseas outposts can still post public messages congratulating the winner of an election without high-level signoff, unless the outcome is contested, but are instructed to focus on the ‘outcome of an election, not the process.’ 

If a bureau wants to post messages denouncing the process of an election, such as in the case of violence during voting or sham elections, they need a senior-level signoff from the bureau and such permissions will be ‘rare.’ 

 

‘DO use messaging on elections to advance a U.S. foreign policy goal,’ the memo read. ‘DON’T use it to promote an ideology.’ 

Those writing official statements are instructed to ask themselves, ‘Would the president say it?’ 

The U.S.’ view on an election is closely watched by opposition groups and human rights activitists, and sometimes defines whether a nation is sanctioned or granted foreign aid. 

In a speech in Saudi Arabia in May, President Donald Trump said the U.S. would refrain from telling other countries how to manage their domestic affairs, reorienting U.S. policy that prompted interventions across the Middle East for decades. 

But still, in some cases, Trump has weighed in on the affairs of other countries: last week he imposed a 50% tariff on Brazil due to the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who prosecutors accuse of trying to overturn the 2022 election results in a violent coup plot. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Previous Post

Unearthed chats shed light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists

Next Post

Not ‘honest’ news organizations: White House defends yanking $9B ‘worth of crap’ in rescissions package

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Latest News

    • White House pushes back forcefully on Epstein file criticism: ‘Asinine suggestion’
    • ‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for more partisan spending process
    • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ
    • Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists, raising ethical concerns
    • Not ‘honest’ news organizations: White House defends yanking $9B ‘worth of crap’ in rescissions package
    Disclaimer: yourprioritydeal.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Latest News

    • White House pushes back forcefully on Epstein file criticism: ‘Asinine suggestion’
    • ‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for more partisan spending process
    • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ
    • Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists, raising ethical concerns
    • Not ‘honest’ news organizations: White House defends yanking $9B ‘worth of crap’ in rescissions package

    Copyright © 2025 yourprioritydeal.com All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Economy
    • Stocks
    • Politics
    • Investing

    Copyright © 2025 yourprioritydeal.com All Rights Reserved